From pilot to profit: The real state of AI in Accounts Payable
-
The evidence behind the AI mandate in Accounts Payable
-
Why AI projects in AP stall, and what to do about it
-
An AI transformation blueprint, tested by Mortenson, one of the fastest growing construction companies in the US
-
How agentic technology will continue to impact Accounts Payable
- 1 in 3finance roles now explicitly ask for AI or machine learning skills
- 81%of AP teams have no AI in their workflow at all
- 18.4%average AP exception rate
- 4%of AP teams have exception management fully automated
“Buying a tool doesn’t fix a broken process, it just automates the mess faster.”
The AI pilot trap
Most AP AI initiatives don't fail loudly. They stall quietly, stuck in permanent “pilot” mode. Without agreed success criteria, the pilot just keeps running quietly in the background.
- 1
An initiative starts
The mandate is felt, and someone is asked to act on it
- 2
Tool before problem
A vendor or in-house build is chosen before the problem is defined
- 3
Pilot greenlit anyway
Momentum is easier to generate than clarity
- 4
It stalls
Success was never defined tightly enough to know if it's working
- 5
Scaling can't be justified
ROI is harder to prove than the business case assumed
“There's an AI mandate at board level, no question. Whether that's landed in the way GBS actually operates day to day is a different conversation entirely.”
Why AI projects in AP stall, and what to do about it
These five patterns show up repeatedly across the market, regardless of who's running the project.
- 01
Attempting to automate a broken process
AI doesn't fix a bad process. It runs it faster and at greater scale, including all of its mistakes.
The fixIn the full report - 02
Undefined success criteria
Most projects define success after the fact, once someone asks whether it worked.
The fixIn the full report - 03
Data quality as an afterthought
The fixIn the full report - 04
Governance gaps
The fixIn the full report - 05
Vendor selection before problem definition
The fixIn the full report
From AI pilot to live programme: Mortenson’s blueprint
Ryan Ambrose leads finance process, data, and technology at Mortenson, one of the fastest-growing construction companies in the US. It jumped from No. 22 to No. 10 on ENR's 2026 Top 400 Contractors list as revenue climbed from $6.7bn to $10.8bn in a year, and now processes 300,000+ invoices a year on Oracle. But growth like that can punish a broken process fast.
“If you scale AI on top of a broken process, you're scaling chaos, not progress.”
What follows is Mortenson's framework to build a prioritised AI roadmap, in five steps, a blueprint that avoids the trap of AI pilots and instead creates a repeatable methodology for digital transformation.
- Step 1Govern
- Step 2Map
- Step 3Score
- Step 4Set KPIs
- Step 5Activate, buy or build
Download the full report
From pilot to profit: The real state of AI in Accounts Payable
- The evidence behind the AI mandate in Accounts Payable
- The honest state of AP AI adoption
- Why AI projects in AP stall, and what to do about it
- From AI pilot to live programme: Mortenson’s blueprint
- How agentic technology will continue to impact Accounts Payable
How ready are you for AI?
The market has already answered whether AI belongs in AP. Mortenson’s blueprint shows what doing it in order looks like. The next step is knowing where you stand today, so we built two free tools to help.
AI transformation readiness assessment
See which of your AP processes are ready for AI, and get the business case to fund them.
- Score each process on five dimensions
- Get a tiered roadmap: ready now, needs targeted work, needs foundations
- About 2 minutes per process
AP AI skills assessment
See how your skills compare with what AP job listings ask for.
- Four areas: awareness, initiative, hands-on use, impact & growth
- Find out your band and your next step
- About 3 minutes, instant result